The home for the Common Errors in English Usage e-calendar
Saturday, April 20, 2013
volumn/volume: Common Errors in English Usage Entry for Saturday, April 20, 2013
volumn/volume
There are a few unusual words in English ending in MN in which the N is silent, such as “hymn” and “column,” but “volume” is not one of them.
The archaic spelling of "volumn" (referring to a book or a series of periodicals) is derived from the same root as the current word "volume," which originally referred to a measure of space. That common root was the Latin "volumen" which includes both the e and the n.
Over time, the more-familiar spelling (we know of many, many more words ending with "...me" than "...mn") was used for both meanings. At first, of course, the use of "volume" for a publication was an error perpetrated by people of limited education, but time and usage have a way of making vocabulary evolve.
I am 73 and well-educated. Only today have I learned that "volumn" is no longer acceptable to refer to a publication and I must be extinct. I should find a tar pit and rest awhile.
Ok, I can't tell if my last comment went through, so I hope this is not a duplicate...
.. but, I said... thank you qajaq for that insight. I've search Google for the answer to this riddle more than once without much luck. I knew for sure that I had more than teacher who used the "volumn" form. Thanks Again.
I am pretty sure that our Encyclopedias, in the 1960s were spelled with the mn in Volumn. I am my granddaughter's Learning Coach, and the spelling with an e looked wrong to me! Thank you for letting me off the hook!
The archaic spelling of "volumn" (referring to a book or a series of periodicals) is derived from the same root as the current word "volume," which originally referred to a measure of space. That common root was the Latin "volumen" which includes both the e and the n.
ReplyDeleteOver time, the more-familiar spelling (we know of many, many more words ending with "...me" than "...mn") was used for both meanings. At first, of course, the use of "volume" for a publication was an error perpetrated by people of limited education, but time and usage have a way of making vocabulary evolve.
I am 73 and well-educated. Only today have I learned that "volumn" is no longer acceptable to refer to a publication and I must be extinct. I should find a tar pit and rest awhile.
DeleteOk, I can't tell if my last comment went through, so I hope this is not a duplicate...
ReplyDelete.. but, I said... thank you qajaq for that insight. I've search Google for the answer to this riddle more than once without much luck. I knew for sure that I had more than teacher who used the "volumn" form. Thanks Again.
I agree. A common mistake by myself too. And I'm sure I had to write it out 6 times that way in primary school - albeit the 1970's
ReplyDeleteI am pretty sure that our Encyclopedias, in the 1960s were spelled with the mn in Volumn. I am my granddaughter's Learning Coach, and the spelling with an e looked wrong to me! Thank you for letting me off the hook!
ReplyDelete